Dionysius Exiguus and Latin Years

Here we go again, a Latin byline for this month’s installment of calendar trivia. And here I left my Second Edition of the Oxford Libro Sermonum at home! As a side note, if you’re doing some post holiday shopping the soon-to-be-issued two-volume hardcover set of the classic Oxford Latin Dictionary weighs in with 40,000 primary words and 100,000 derivations (headwords and senses if you’re a purist) at the bargain-basement price of $300 would make your Sunday school magister very proud.

Moving along, Dennis the Small (or Little or Short, take your pick) was a Scythian monk residing in Tomis, the major city of Scythia Minor located on the coast of the Black Sea in what we would now refer to as part of Romania. Dionysius did not, though, have to suffer through the swarms of overweight Russian beachgoers wearing too little clothing and drinking too much vodka, that memorable vision was saved for our modern era and, for those of us who have seen it, remains as a searing image in some ways formative in our childhoods….alas. Dionysius lived from AD 470 to AD 544 and is most remembered for having invented the AD that notates even his years of existence. Anno Domini, as we’ve covered at great length, translates as “In the Year of the Lord” and was the replacement for the then-conventional anno Diocletiani – yes, another aD – which set its epoch as the year the Roman Emperor Diocletian assumed power. You have to admire the chutzpah, as our Hebrew-speaking friends would say, of restarting the calendar on one’s inauguration date, Holy Roman Emperor indeed! Anno Diocletiani referencing quickly passed into the world of historical archives with the exception of the Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria who stubbornly stick with its usage even though it means they have very few options for desktop calendars – next year is aD 2296, for example.

If any of this information thus far has struck you as interesting then you’ll be fascinated to learn that there were other year-counting approaches in use. Ab urbe condita (AUC) had its epoch as the year of the founding of Rome, and anno Mundi started with the biblical Creation of the world. Sadly the latter suffered in that there were different epochs depending on which version of the Bible one chose: 5500 BC if you were a Greek Septuagint believer, 4000 BC if the Hebrew Masoretic text was your preference. If you’re a dating purist – I know, I know – or just someone who likes fully-qualified domain names then you know that the official abbreviation is ADNIC (Anno Domini Nostri Iesu Christi) and, because it sources from Latin the convention is to place the AD before the year, ie AD 2012, as opposed to the non-Latin Before Christ and thus 112 BC. If you’re particularly zealous then you could, I suppose, shift to ACN 112 with the recognition that ante Christum natum does have a certain flair to it. The politically correct CE and BCE are particularly noxious to me so we’ll ignore those and leave their usage to people with little sense of tradition or history!

Technically speaking, Dionysius wasn’t originally chartered with changing the frame of reference for everyone’s calendars, rather his task was to assemble the Computus for upcoming Easter dates on behalf of Pope John I starting with what became the year AD 525. Careful readers already know that while Hallmark defines Easter as landing on the Sunday following the Paschal Full Moon (first full moon after the vernal equinox), the Catholic Church uses a theoretical model known as the Ecclesiastical Full Moon instead which would be fine if, for example, 19 tropical years had the same duration as 235 synodal months. Sparing you the details, it doesn’t, but heck if it weren’t for Galileo the Christian faith tradition would still hold that the Sun orbits the Earth so what’s 235 vs. 234.997 amongst friends!

In the course of his work Dionysius also happened upon another major milestone and became the first medieval Latin writer to make use of a true zero through the Latin nulla. This sort of makes sense because carving I’s, V’s and X’s is pretty straightforward, but can you imagine having to carve a 0? The first true zero symbol emerged in India around AD 500, and in AD 880 the Persian scientist al-Khwarizmi first published the Hindu-Arabic numeral system which remains in use to this date. Not so fast, though, in Europe one had to wait for the Latin translation first published in the 12th century. That’s right, until the 12th century it was impossible to be a number 0 in Europe. Oh how times have changed.

Zeroes seem like the kind of thing that a Greek philosopher would have discovered centuries earlier, but there progress ground to a halt as they were stumped by the proposition “how can nothing be something?” This same logic is, apparently, in use by their modern-day government budgeting offices but really in its inverse form, “if we have nothing then that’s something.”

Wrapping things up, and without even getting to my original topic which was that Jesus Christ’s year of birth turns out to be 4 BC (oops!), I leave you with a brief party trick for your New Year’s Eve festivities. If you were counting down the big crystal ball at the close of 1 BC, would the soon-to-illuminate year be 0 BC or AD 0? Buzz. Wrong answer, there was no year 0 in either lexicon, 0 hadn’t yet been invented. Second, at the time it would have been 3760 AM or 753 AUC as BC, AD and aD references had yet to be invented. Duh!

Regardless of snow, sleet, hail, wind, vacation, late flights, traffic jams, long lines at the mall or even the upcoming end of the world (thank you Mayan long count) please be have a very Happy New Year and celebrate AD 2012, aD 2296, AM 5772 or AUC 2765 (take your pick).

Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici and the Number 5

If you’ve caught the evening news anytime during the past couple of weeks you will undoubtedly have seen coverage of the Occupy Wall Street protests. While there is of course a large swirl around their message, where they’re heading and the like I have to confess an admiration for some of the subtlety present in their signs and costumes. As an example, several of the folks at the Tacoma camp – across the street from the Harmon Brewery, very convenient – can be seen today sporting masks similar to the one adjacent to this paragraph.

Many of you will pride yourselves on recognizing it as the face of the protagonist in V for Vendetta and consider yourselves trivia gurus for having done so. Sadly, though, you’re coming up well short of earning the Trivia Master scout badge, for that you would have needed to harken all the way back to Alan Moore and David Lloyd’s original ten-issue comic book series V for Vendetta. Alan Moore, by the way, passionately objects to having his works turned into movies but that hasn’t stopped Hollywood from churning out From Hell, V for Vendetta, The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen and most recently Watchmen.

The V for Vendetta movie, released in 2006, is a classic anti-hero vs. the establishment plotline – similar in some ways to the classic 1984 Apple commercial and involves the main character V working with the heroine Evey as they battle the establishment together. If for nothing else you have to admire alliteration skills, such as in V’s self-introduction to Evey early in the film:
Voilà! In view, a humble vaudevillian veteran, cast vicariously as both victim and villain by the vicissitudes of fate. This visage, no mere veneer of vanity, is a vestige of the vox populi, now vacant, vanished. However, this valorous visitation of a bygone vexation stands vivified, and has vowed to vanquish these venal and virulent vermin vanguarding vice and vouchsafing the violently vicious and voracious violation of volition! The only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous. Verily, this vichyssoise of verbiage veers most verbose, so let me simply add that it’s my very good honour to meet you and you may call me V.
If you read the above paragraph carefully you would have caught the Latin phrase vox populi (voice of the people) and possibly started down the path of thinking about Roman numerals. V is obviously 5 in Roman numerals and the numerologists have been having a field day with this and the movie ever since. My personal favorite resonance is the use of the latinVi Veri VeniversumVivusVici (note the 5 V’s) as V’s watch phrase, loosely translated it means “by the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe.” I also admire the use of Beethoven’s Fifth symphony in various spots throughout the film. Job done!

In a very subtle moment towards the end of the film there’s a shot of Big Ben at time 11:05 – yes, there’s another 5 – but the larger reference here is to the calendar date of November 5th. Come on, this has to be common knowledge, clearly that’s a reference to Bonfire Night. What? Still not there? How about if I rattle off one of the 13 plotters caught in an attempt to detonate an Improvised Explosive Device under the House of Lords on that holiday? Guy Fawkes would be the reference here and corresponds neatly to the movie as shortly thereafter V starts blowing up most of London.

Bonfire Night in the UK is their version of the holiday known elsewhere as Devil’s Night, Hell Night, Cabbage Night, Gate Night, Mizzy Night, Miggy Night (err..what?), Goosing Night and Egg Nyte. Just ask the residents of Detroit in the 1980′s and they’ll tell you, these are all events that happen on October 30th when in a pre-Halloween-candy-rush-frenzy people can get a little out-of-hand with eggs, toilet paper, soap and other pranks, but for some the tradition extends to, well, arson and blowing things up. Take cover!

While I have little suspicion that any of our motley crue (no…come on, no one here has hair like them and look, there’s no umlaut on the u!) will be out Sunday night committing pranks of a foul nature, I wouldn’t put it past the group to be dreaming up something akin to putting an Austin Seven on the roof of Cambridge University. In general I encourage such behavior, but in the unlikely event you wind up needing bail money please don’t call me first.

Thanks all, and Happy Halloween to everyone!

Business Examiner: Mr. Magoo, the Mumbler and the Mad Scientist

Two in one month! This month’s column in the Business Examiner starts out as being publicly-accessible so we’re able to bring it to you earlier than usual. Please click through and give it a read, post comments there if you like or don’t like what you found. Thank you!

“Talking Tech: Mr. Magoo, the Mumbler and the Mad Scientist” – Business Examiner (October 31, 2011)

Business Examiner: King Harald Wants to Set You Free!

Our good friends at The Business Examiner have our most recent article up on their website, if you’re thinking about wireless this is a good place to start. Please click through and give it a read, post comments there if you like or don’t like what you found. Thank you!

“Talking Tech: King Harald Wants to Set You Free” – Business Examiner (October 3, 2011)

Business Examiner: Backup Systems, Parachutes and Your Data

As promised, this month’s Business Examiner column tells the tale of parachuting. Please click through and give it a read, post comments there if you like or don’t like what you found. Thank you!

“Backup Systems, Parachutes and Your Data” – Business Examiner (August 22, 2011)

Page 1 of 3123»